Skip to content
CAADCA · CAADCA-9931A6-PROFILING

CAADCA Section 1798.99.31(a)(6) - Profiling by Default

Profiling of children is prohibited by default unless necessary for the actively used feature with safeguards, or demonstrably in children's best interests

CRITICALProhibitionProfilingBinding regulationIn forceApplies from 1 July 2024

Where this comes from

Provision: Section 1798.99.31(a)(6) - Profiling by Default

Instrument: California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (AB 2273)

Citation: Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.99.31(a)(6), California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (AB 2273)

Text version: California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, AB-2273 (2022); Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.99.28–1798.99.40

Read the official text ↗

Who it applies to

Likely accessed by children — all of these:

  • Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18

Profiling indicator (any) — any one of these:

  • Service collects behavioral data
  • Service uses content personalization
  • Service uses recommendation algorithms
  • Service serves targeted advertising

…unless:

  • Profiling is permitted where strictly necessary to provide the service requested by the child. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.99.31(c)(2))
  • Profiling for legal compliance, fraud prevention, or safety is permitted. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.99.31(c)(3))

Scope in the source's own terms

  • Service uses profiling of children
  • Profiling affects child users
  • Service available to California residents

What engineering work it implies

Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:

  • User model has `profilingEnabled` boolean field (default: false)
  • Recommendation engine checks profilingEnabled before processing user
  • Behavioral tracking skips users with profilingEnabled=false
  • Ad targeting excludes users with profilingEnabled=false
  • Admin dashboard shows count of users with profiling disabled

Evidence an auditor expects

  • Technical controlTechnical audit

    Profiling restriction implementation

    Code/configuration showing profiling disabled for child users except where strictly necessary

  • Policy documentDocument review

    Profiling policy for children

    Policy documenting any profiling of children with necessity justification

Questions people ask

Does CAADCA Section 1798.99.31(a)(6) - Profiling by Default apply to my service?
It applies when Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18; and at least one of: Service collects behavioral data; Service uses content personalization; Service uses recommendation algorithms; Service serves targeted advertising. It does not apply where Profiling is permitted where strictly necessary to provide the service requested by the child. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.99.31(c)(2)).
From when does this apply?
CAADCA Section 1798.99.31(a)(6) - Profiling by Default applies from 1 July 2024. Its current status is: in force.
What evidence does an auditor expect?
Profiling restriction implementation; Profiling policy for children.

Find out whether this one lands on you

Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.

Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations