EU DSA Article 27 - Recommender system transparency
Disclose recommender system parameters in terms and conditions and offer users at least one non-profiling-based recommendation option
Where this comes from
Provision: Article 27 - Recommender system transparency
Instrument: EU Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065)
Citation: Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 27
Text version: Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (DSA), OJ L 277, 27.10.2022
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service is an online platform
- Service has users in the European Union
- Service uses recommender systems
…unless:
- Micro and small enterprises have reduced recommender transparency requirements. (DSA Article 19)
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Disclosure is accessible within 2 clicks from main navigation
- Content is written at appropriate reading level (8th grade for general, lower for kids)
- Disclosure includes: what data is collected, why, how long kept, who it's shared with
- Last updated date is visible on the disclosure
- Disclosure is available in all languages the product supports
Questions people ask
- Does EU DSA Article 27 - Recommender system transparency apply to my service?
- It applies when Service is an online platform; Service has users in the European Union; Service uses recommender systems. It does not apply where Micro and small enterprises have reduced recommender transparency requirements. (DSA Article 19).
- From when does this apply?
- EU DSA Article 27 - Recommender system transparency applies from 17 February 2024. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.