SG PDPA PDPC Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data, Section 3.2 - Consent for Children Aged 13 to 17
Ensure children aged 13-17 can understand consent consequences; obtain parental consent if understanding is insufficient
Where this comes from
Provision: PDPC Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data, Section 3.2 - Consent for Children Aged 13 to 17
Instrument: Singapore Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)
Citation: Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data (March 2024), Section 3.2; Personal Data Protection Act 2012, Sections 13-17
Text version: PDPA 2012 (2020 Rev. Ed.); PDPC Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data (2024)
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Youngest user age is 13-15 or 16-17
- Service requires/offers account registration
- Service is specifically designed for children under 18
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Consent modal/page appears BEFORE data collection begins
- Consent options are granular (user can accept some, reject others)
- 'Reject All' is as prominent as 'Accept All'
- No pre-checked boxes - all start unchecked
- When relying on consent, store the necessary scoped consent reference, purposes and choices, timestamp and notice version; avoid collecting extra identity data solely for the record
Questions people ask
- Does SG PDPA PDPC Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data, Section 3.2 - C… apply to my service?
- It applies when Youngest user age is 13-15 or 16-17; Service requires/offers account registration; Service is specifically designed for children under 18.
- From when does this apply?
- SG PDPA PDPC Advisory Guidelines on Children's Personal Data, Section 3.2 - C… applies from 1 March 2024. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.