NIST CSF GV.OC - Organizational Context
Establish and maintain understanding of organizational context — mission, stakeholder expectations, dependencies, and legal/regulatory requirements — to inform cybersecurity risk management decisions
Where this comes from
Provision: GV.OC - Organizational Context
Instrument: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (February 2024)
Citation: NIST CSWP 29, The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, 26 February 2024, Appendix A (CSF Core), GV.OC (Organizational Context), subcategories GV.OC-01, GV.OC-02, GV.OC-03, GV.OC-04, GV.OC-05
Text version: NIST CSWP 29, The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, 26 February 2024, Appendix A (CSF Core); retrieved from nvlpubs.nist.gov on 2026-09-23.
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Data categories collected — any answer
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Implementation or documented process meets the reviewed acceptance criteria; identify the tested version and deployment status separately
- Configure defaults from the assessed source and purpose; do not enable data collection or processing merely because this task exists
- Validate behavior for the assessed actors and use cases, including applicable guest or administrator paths
- UI clearly communicates what the feature does to users
- API returns appropriate error codes when feature blocks an action
Questions people ask
- Does NIST CSF GV.OC - Organizational Context apply to my service?
- It applies when Data categories collected — any answer.
- From when does this apply?
- NIST CSF GV.OC - Organizational Context applies from 26 February 2024. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.