GDPR-K Recital 38 - Restriction on profiling and marketing to children
Restrict the use of children's personal data for marketing purposes or for creating personality or user profiles
Where this comes from
Provision: Recital 38 - Restriction on profiling and marketing to children
Instrument: General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Citation: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016, Recital 38, read with Articles 22 and 6(1)(f)
Text version: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, consolidated
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18
- Service uses content personalization
- Service serves targeted advertising
What engineering work it implies
- Profiling Opt-Out MechanismCovers it fully
Allow users to disable behavioral profiling with immediate effect on recommendations.
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- User model has `profilingEnabled` boolean field (default: false)
- Recommendation engine checks profilingEnabled before processing user
- Behavioral tracking skips users with profilingEnabled=false
- Ad targeting excludes users with profilingEnabled=false
- Admin dashboard shows count of users with profiling disabled
Questions people ask
- Does GDPR-K Recital 38 - Restriction on profiling and marketing to children apply to my service?
- It applies when Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18; Service uses content personalization; Service serves targeted advertising.
- From when does this apply?
- GDPR-K Recital 38 - Restriction on profiling and marketing to children applies from 25 May 2018. Its current status is: in force.
- What engineering work does this imply?
- Typically: Profiling Opt-Out Mechanism.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.