EU DSA Article 11 - Points of contact for Member States' authorities, the Commission and the Board
Designate and publish a single point of contact for communication with EU authorities regarding DSA compliance
Where this comes from
Provision: Article 11 - Points of contact for Member States' authorities, the Commission and the Board
Instrument: EU Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065)
Citation: Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 11
Text version: Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (DSA), OJ L 277, 27.10.2022
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service is an intermediary service
- Service has users in the European Union
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Implementation or documented process meets the reviewed acceptance criteria; identify the tested version and deployment status separately
- Configure defaults from the assessed source and purpose; do not enable data collection or processing merely because this task exists
- Validate behavior for the assessed actors and use cases, including applicable guest or administrator paths
- UI clearly communicates what the feature does to users
- API returns appropriate error codes when feature blocks an action
Questions people ask
- Does EU DSA Article 11 - Points of contact for Member States' authorities, the Com… apply to my service?
- It applies when Service is an intermediary service; Service has users in the European Union.
- From when does this apply?
- EU DSA Article 11 - Points of contact for Member States' authorities, the Com… applies from 17 February 2024. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.