Skip to content
EU AI Act · EU-AI-ACT-ART-55-SYSTEMIC-RISK-ASSESSMENT

EU AI Act Article 55(1)(b)

Assess and mitigate possible Union-level systemic risks and their sources throughout the GPAI model lifecycle

HIGHAssessment dutyGovernanceBinding regulationIn forceEnforceable from 2 August 2025

Where this comes from

Provision: Article 55(1)(b)

Instrument: EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

Citation: Article 55(1)(b), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

Text version: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, consolidated 27 July 2026; original OJ L 12 July 2024 and amendment (EU) 2026/1744

Checked against the source: 6 September 2026

Read the official text ↗

Who it applies to

Article 55(1)(b) model-provider scope — all of these:

  • Project involves providing a general-purpose AI model (GPAI)
  • GPAI assessed Union model scope: YES
  • GPAI assessed Article 51 classification: YES

What engineering work it implies

Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:

  • Assess possible systemic risks at Union level and their sources across development, market placement and use
  • Link each risk pathway to implemented mitigations, owners and effectiveness evidence; record uncertainty and residual risk
  • Use evaluation and serious-incident information as inputs without substituting them for Article 55(1)(b) assessment and mitigation
  • Document a justified reassessment process and protect confidential material under Articles 55(3) and 78
  • Record model version, source version and Article 111(3) placement-date transition before an enforcement conclusion

Evidence an auditor expects

  • Assessment documentDocument review

    Article 55(1)(b) Union-level systemic-risk assessment

    Model-specific assessment of possible Union-level systemic risks and their sources from development, market placement and use; record plausible pathways, impact, uncertainty and residual risks. An incident register or evaluation report alone does not complete this assessment.

  • Process recordDocument review

    Systemic-risk mitigation and effectiveness evidence

    Link identified risks and sources to implemented mitigations, owners, effectiveness evidence and remaining gaps. Justify reassessment cadence without inventing an annual certification or a universal 72-hour report. Protect confidential material and use a justified retention policy.

Questions people ask

Does EU AI Act Article 55(1)(b) apply to my service?
It applies when Project involves providing a general-purpose AI model (GPAI); GPAI assessed Union model scope: YES; GPAI assessed Article 51 classification: YES.
When does this become enforceable?
EU AI Act Article 55(1)(b) is enforceable from 2 August 2025. Its current status is: in force.
What evidence does an auditor expect?
Article 55(1)(b) Union-level systemic-risk assessment; Systemic-risk mitigation and effectiveness evidence.

Find out whether this one lands on you

Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.

Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations