Skip to content
EU AI Act · EU-AI-ACT-ART-4-AI-LITERACY

EU AI Act Article 4(1) — AI literacy (amended 2026)

Take context-sensitive measures to support AI literacy development among staff and persons operating AI systems on your behalf

MEDIUMRequirementGovernanceBinding regulationIn forceEnforceable from 27 July 2026

Where this comes from

Provision: Article 4(1) — AI literacy (amended 2026)

Instrument: EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

Citation: Article 4(1), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 Article 1(5)

Text version: Amended Article 4(1): Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 Article 1(5), OJ 24.7.2026

Checked against the source: 6 September 2026

Read the official text ↗

Who it applies to

AI system in scope of the Act (Art. 2) — all of these:

  • Service deploys AI systems in a professional capacity

…unless:

  • AI Act scope exclusion is used exclusively for military, defence or national-security purposes or developed and used solely for scientific research and development
  • Art. 2(3): the Regulation 'does not apply to AI systems where and in so far as they are placed on the market, put into service, or used with or without modification exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes'. (AI Act Art. 2(3))
  • Art. 2(6): the Regulation 'does not apply to AI systems or AI models, including their output, specifically developed and put into service for the sole purpose of scientific research and development'. (AI Act Art. 2(6))

Scope in the source's own terms

  • Art. 2(1): the AI system is placed on the market or put into service in the Union, or the provider/deployer is established in the Union, or the output produced by the system is used in the Union
  • Art. 4: the duty binds 'providers and deployers of AI systems' alike, at every risk tier — there is no high-risk precondition

What engineering work it implies

  • AI Literacy Programme (Role Matrix + Training Record)Covers it fully

    A lightweight process pattern for Article 4: a role matrix saying what each role must understand, a training record per person, and a gate that ties the oversight...

Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:

  • Staff and persons operating or using AI systems on the organisation's behalf are identified
  • Measures take account of their knowledge, experience, education and training, the use context and affected people or groups
  • Measures supporting literacy development are implemented and documented with their contextual basis
  • The evidence does not claim a guaranteed literacy level for any individual
  • Any certification, renewal period or restriction on decision authority is labelled as an organisational policy or separately sourced oversight control

Evidence an auditor expects

  • Training recordDocument review

    Landfall evidence request: measures supporting AI literacy development for staff and persons acting on the organisation's behalf

    Describe the measures actually taken and their contextual basis under amended Article 4(1): knowledge, experience, education, training, use context and affected people. Records may evidence guidance or other support as well as training. No specific individual literacy level, certification, annual renewal or personal completion database is prescribed by Article 4; minimise personal data in the evidence

  • Policy documentDocument review

    Landfall supporting evidence: literacy development plan for the population in scope

    Record the population, relevant context, selected support measures and responsible owner. A written plan is an implementation aid, not a statutory format or guarantee that each individual attains a specific literacy level

Questions people ask

Does EU AI Act Article 4(1) — AI literacy (amended 2026) apply to my service?
It applies when Service deploys AI systems in a professional capacity. It does not apply where AI Act scope exclusion is used exclusively for military, defence or national-security purposes or developed and used solely for scientific research and development.
When does this become enforceable?
EU AI Act Article 4(1) — AI literacy (amended 2026) is enforceable from 27 July 2026. Its current status is: in force.
What evidence does an auditor expect?
Landfall evidence request: measures supporting AI literacy development for staff and persons acting on the organisation's behalf; Landfall supporting evidence: literacy development plan for the population in scope.

Find out whether this one lands on you

Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.

Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations