BR LGPD Article 14 SS5 - Verification of parental consent
Make all reasonable efforts to verify that parental consent was genuinely given by the parent or guardian, using available technologies
Where this comes from
Provision: Article 14 SS5 - Verification of parental consent
Instrument: Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD)
Citation: Lei nº 13.709/2018 (LGPD), Artigo 14, SS5; ANPD Resolution CD/ANPD No. 2/2022 (consent verification guidelines)
Text version: Lei nº 13.709/2018 (LGPD), texto compilado
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Youngest expected user age: Under 13
- Service requires/offers account registration
What engineering work it implies
- Parental Consent and ControlsCovers it fully
Implement verifiable parental consent for users under threshold age with ongoing parental controls.
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Consent modal/page appears BEFORE data collection begins
- Consent options are granular (user can accept some, reject others)
- 'Reject All' is as prominent as 'Accept All'
- No pre-checked boxes - all start unchecked
- When relying on consent, store the necessary scoped consent reference, purposes and choices, timestamp and notice version; avoid collecting extra identity data solely for the record
Questions people ask
- Does BR LGPD Article 14 SS5 - Verification of parental consent apply to my service?
- It applies when Youngest expected user age: Under 13; Service requires/offers account registration.
- From when does this apply?
- BR LGPD Article 14 SS5 - Verification of parental consent applies from 18 September 2020. Its current status is: in force.
- What engineering work does this imply?
- Typically: Parental Consent and Controls.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.