AU OSA Part 9, Sections 119-134 - Image-Based Abuse Scheme
Comply with the image-based abuse scheme by removing non-consensual intimate images within 24 hours of a removal notice
Where this comes from
Provision: Part 9, Sections 119-134 - Image-Based Abuse Scheme
Instrument: Australia Online Safety Act 2021
Citation: Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth), Part 9, ss 119-134
Text version: Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth), current compilation incl. Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024; BOSE Determination 2022 (as amended 2024)
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service allows user-generated content
- Service enables direct messaging between users
- Data categories collected includes Photos / Videos
- Users can create public profiles
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- A workflow ingests eSafety Commissioner removal notices and tracks each to completion within the 24-hour window
- Non-consensual intimate images can be reported and are removed on notice
- Removed non-consensual intimate images are hash-blocked to prevent re-upload
- Notice receipt, action taken, and timing are logged as compliance evidence
- System handles null/empty input gracefully (no 500 errors)
Questions people ask
- Does AU OSA Part 9, Sections 119-134 - Image-Based Abuse Scheme apply to my service?
- It applies when Service allows user-generated content; Service enables direct messaging between users; Data categories collected includes Photos / Videos; Users can create public profiles.
- From when does this apply?
- AU OSA Part 9, Sections 119-134 - Image-Based Abuse Scheme applies from 23 January 2022. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.