Skip to content
COPPA · COPPA-312-3-THIRD-PARTY-COLLECTION

COPPA 16 CFR 312.2, 312.3 and 312.8(c) - Host responsibility for collection on its behalf

Assess and control collection on a covered host's behalf, including non-advertising SDKs and service providers

CRITICALProcess dutyData collectionBinding regulationIn forceApplies from 22 April 2026

Where this comes from

Provision: 16 CFR 312.2, 312.3 and 312.8(c) - Host responsibility for collection on its behalf

Instrument: Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Citation: 16 CFR 312.2 (Operator, Collects or collection, Disclose or disclosure, Third party), 312.3, 312.4(d)(1)-(2), 312.5 and 312.8(c); 90 FR 16918 (22 April 2025), effective 23 June 2025, general compliance date 22 April 2026.

Text version: 2025 final rule, 90 FR 16918, 16977-16981, retrieved 6 September 2026; amended 312.8(c) general compliance 22 April 2026. Earlier host responsibility existed before these written-assurance amendments.

Checked against the source: 6 September 2026

Read the official text ↗

Who it applies to

It applies when all of these are true:

  • COPPA assessed activity Q_COPPA_COVERED_ACTIVITY: YES
  • What is your role in this collection of children's information? is Host whose activity includes third-party collection or Both roles in the assessed activity

What engineering work it implies

Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:

  • Establish this activity's covered-host role and inventory agents, service providers and other entities collecting/maintaining child information on its behalf, including SDK and server-side flows with advertising disabled.
  • Assess 312.2's agency/service-provider or host-benefit basis, actual personal information and passive tracking; vendor labels and contracts alone do not decide legal roles.
  • Apply host notice, consent or the complete exact exception, purpose, parental-rights, security and retention duties to each flow; distinguish 312.2 disclosure/third-party definitions and 312.5(a)(2) separate choice.
  • Before allowing 312.8(c) collection/maintenance/release, take reasonable steps to determine recipient security capability and obtain written assurances of reasonable security measures; a generic consent warranty or child-directed-site email is not a substitute.
  • Do not miscite 312.3(c), which concerns parental review, as a universal SDK-notification rule. Assess the embedded provider's distinct actual-knowledge coverage separately.

Evidence an auditor expects

  • Policy documentDocument review

    Host collection and recipient safeguard assessment

    [ ] Establish this activity's covered-host role and inventory agents, service providers and other entities collecting/maintaining child information on its behalf, including SDK and server-side flows with advertising disabled. [ ] Assess 312.2's agency/service-provider or host-benefit basis, actual personal information and passive tracking; vendor labels and contracts alone do not decide legal roles. [ ] Apply host notice, consent or the complete exact exception, purpose, parental-rights, security and retention duties to each flow; distinguish 312.2 disclosure/third-party definitions and 312.5(a)(2) separate choice. [ ] Before allowing 312.8(c) collection/maintenance/release, take reasonable steps to determine recipient security capability and obtain written assurances of reasonable security measures; a generic consent warranty or child-directed-site email is not a substitute. [ ] Do not miscite 312.3(c), which concerns parental review, as a universal SDK-notification rule. Assess the embedded provider's distinct actual-knowledge coverage separately. [ ] Prevent unsupported flows and test real client/server traffic before/after consent, refusal and vendor changes. CSP is not proof for mobile SDKs or server calls; retain minimized inventory, assurance and test evidence without child payloads. Evidence supports review; it is not consent, exception approval or legal certification.

Questions people ask

Does COPPA 16 CFR 312.2, 312.3 and 312.8(c) - Host responsibility for collection o… apply to my service?
It applies when COPPA assessed activity Q_COPPA_COVERED_ACTIVITY: YES; What is your role in this collection of children's information? is Host whose activity includes third-party collection or Both roles in the assessed activity.
From when does this apply?
COPPA 16 CFR 312.2, 312.3 and 312.8(c) - Host responsibility for collection o… applies from 22 April 2026. Its current status is: in force.
What evidence does an auditor expect?
Host collection and recipient safeguard assessment.

Find out whether this one lands on you

Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.

Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations