BR LGPD Arts. 2(II), 19 and 39 - child-monitoring product safeguards
Protect child-monitoring capture, storage and transmission and inform the child
Where this comes from
Provision: Arts. 2(II), 19 and 39 - child-monitoring product safeguards
Instrument: ECA Digital (Lei nº 15.211/2025)
Citation: Lei nº 15.211/2025, Arts. 2(II), 19 and 39 - child-monitoring product safeguards; Articles 1-3, 7 and 41; Lei nº 15.352/2026
Text version: Lei nº 15.211, de 17 de setembro de 2025, Articles 16-19 and 39; commencement amended by Lei nº 15.352/2026
Checked against the source: 6 September 2026
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_CHILD_MONITORING_PROVIDER: YES
…unless:
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_SERVICE_CLASS: YES
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_CLASSIFICATION: YES
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_TRANSPARENCY: YES
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_PARENTAL_CONTROLS: YES
- Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_REPORT_CHANNEL: YES
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Assess the actual supplier of a child-monitoring product/service available in Brazil under Articles 2(II) and 19: technology intended for parents/guardians to follow children's/adolescents' digital actions through recording or transmission of images, sounds, location, activity or other data. Generic analytics, a parent-facing purchaser label or the absence of child-created accounts cannot alone decide this role.
- For Article 19, assess Article 39's service-specific modulation and conditional dispensation only where the actual eligible editorial-control or previously licensed-content class and all classification/alternative age-adequacy and signalling, age-classification transparency, complete accessible parental-mediation controls and accessible reporting channels are established. Controls must cover age-based content, personal data, user interaction and commercial transactions. Preserve replacement and non-listed safeguards; do not infer relief from a generic content or monitoring label.
- Use current information-and-communication-technology mechanisms and solutions to protect the inviolability of images, sounds and other information captured, stored and transmitted to parents or legal guardians. Assess the actual capture/storage/transmission and authorized guardian access paths; encrypting transport alone does not establish every protection.
- Provide mechanisms informing children and adolescents in appropriate language that monitoring is taking place. Development and use of monitoring must follow their best interests and full development of their capacities. A guardian dashboard or hidden monitoring control alone does not meet the child-facing notice duty.
- Use synthetic or sanitized assessment cases and minimized configuration, access, control and review evidence. Exclude real child identities, conversations, images, recordings, precise locations and raw personal-data reports from ordinary task attachments, exports and general logs. Keep any legally necessary sensitive operational material in a separately authorized, purpose-limited process with assessed access and retention. This is an engineering evidence-minimization safeguard, not a prescribed fixed log schema or retention period.
Evidence an auditor expects
- Assessment documentDocument review
Protect child-monitoring capture, storage and transmission and inform the child — scoped assessment and minimized evidence
Assess the actual supplier of a child-monitoring product/service available in Brazil under Articles 2(II) and 19: technology intended for parents/guardians to follow children's/adolescents' digital actions through recording or transmission of images, sounds, location, activity or other data. Generic analytics, a parent-facing purchaser label or the absence of child-created accounts cannot alone decide this role. For Article 19, assess Article 39's service-specific modulation and conditional dispensation only where the actual eligible editorial-control or previously licensed-content class and all classification/alternative age-adequacy and signalling, age-classification transparency, complete accessible parental-mediation controls and accessible reporting channels are established. Controls must cover age-based content, personal data, user interaction and commercial transactions. Preserve replacement and non-listed safeguards; do not infer relief from a generic content or monitoring label. Use current information-and-communication-technology mechanisms and solutions to protect the inviolability of images, sounds and other information captured, stored and transmitted to parents or legal guardians. Assess the actual capture/storage/transmission and authorized guardian access paths; encrypting transport alone does not establish every protection. Provide mechanisms informing children and adolescents in appropriate language that monitoring is taking place. Development and use of monitoring must follow their best interests and full development of their capacities. A guardian dashboard or hidden monitoring control alone does not meet the child-facing notice duty. Use synthetic or sanitized assessment cases and minimized configuration, access, control and review evidence. Exclude real child identities, conversations, images, recordings, precise locations and raw personal-data reports from ordinary task attachments, exports and general logs. Keep any legally necessary sensitive operational material in a separately authorized, purpose-limited process with assessed access and retention. This is an engineering evidence-minimization safeguard, not a prescribed fixed log schema or retention period. Verify current ANPD implementing requirements and qualified Portuguese source review. Lei 15.211/2025 commenced on 17 March 2026 following Lei 15.352/2026; do not infer all historical legal outcomes or full ECA Digital compliance from this record.
Questions people ask
- Does BR LGPD Arts. 2(II), 19 and 39 - child-monitoring product safeguards apply to my service?
- It applies when Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_CHILD_MONITORING_PROVIDER: YES. It does not apply where Brazil ECA Digital assessed fact Q_BR_ECA_ART39_SERVICE_CLASS: YES.
- From when does this apply?
- BR LGPD Arts. 2(II), 19 and 39 - child-monitoring product safeguards applies from 17 March 2026. Its current status is: in force.
- What evidence does an auditor expect?
- Protect child-monitoring capture, storage and transmission and inform the child — scoped assessment and minimized evidence.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.