AIUC-1 C007 — Flag high risk outputs for human review (C. Safety)
Route outputs the system judges high-risk to a human before they reach the user.
Where this comes from
Provision: C007 — Flag high risk outputs for human review (C. Safety)
Instrument: AIUC-1 — AI agent certification standard (Artificial Intelligence Underwriting Company)
Citation: AIUC-1, requirement C007 (C. Safety) — optional, preventative control, assessed every 12 months. Not law: AIUC-1 is a voluntary certification standard, not a binding instrument.
Text version: AIUC-1 as published at aiuc-1.com (quarterly releases; no public version number)
Checked against the source: 4 September 2026
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service deploys AI systems in a professional capacity
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- A human reviewer can inspect the inputs, the output and the rationale for an automated decision before it takes effect
- The reviewer is shown the system's capacities and limits and its declared accuracy, so disagreeing is a real option (Art. 14(4)(a), (c))
- The reviewer can decide not to use the output, or to disregard, override or reverse it, without engineering intervention (Art. 14(4)(d))
- A stop control halts the system, and it is reachable by the assigned person without a deploy (Art. 14(4)(e))
- Oversight is assigned to named natural persons who have the competence, training and authority the role requires (Art. 26(2))
Questions people ask
- Does AIUC-1 C007 — Flag high risk outputs for human review (C. Safety) apply to my service?
- It applies when Service deploys AI systems in a professional capacity.
- From when does this apply?
- AIUC-1 C007 — Flag high risk outputs for human review (C. Safety) applies from 1 July 2025. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.